In regards to the five portfolio subjects, my personal learning process has generally been exploratory. I was urged to delve into the Dutch culture from various angles, each represented in one of the portfolio subjects. For the most part, I felt both obligated and inspired to get my hands dirty and force myself to interact one-on-one with the Dutch. I was not always successful, but effort is worth an honorable-mention.
The first couple of months in the Netherlands were not easy for me. I was afraid of my own shadow. I was afraid to be myself because I did not want to appear offensive, (as an American with different cultural norms, habits, and convictions). For the first time in my life, I was the minority; consequently, it was my turn to develop myself personally and educationally in this new and unusual environment. Generally, my initial responses were somewhat bigoted. I felt responsible for defending myself, rather than expressing myself. It was like a war field, I against the Netherlands, who will win? Of course, I would like to have come out strong, but as the minority, I ended up surrendering to the will of my educational experience. Commonly, my initial reactions were some form of jealousy, carelessness, or frustration. The preparatory aspect of high school practical education in the Netherlands made me fairly jealous, I was less than enthused in subjects relating to political movements and new events, and when asked whether or not the Netherlands was a Christian society I was rather perturbed. I found the most frustrating aspect of my educational experience abroad to be defining myself, the timeless interrogative sentence: who am I?
Always having to be politically correct had proven itself impractical over the last four months. It was most difficult for me to form personal opinions because I did not want to accuse the Dutch for being "wrong". I’ve learned that it is not always easy to fully respect the cultural differences of a foreign country. I’ve concluded; however, that in culture, there is no "right" or "wrong", there is only different, and sometimes different can be agitating as it forces us to challenge, and in some cases defend, our innate "standard" world view. Overall, I underwent a lot of character development, which often resulted in an emotional state of discomposure. My attitude, thus, was not always a pretty one.
In evaluating the five portfolio subjects, I must say, at first I was very bitter towards them and was not at all motivated; however, now that I have completed the requirements and am able to view them from an accomplished point-of-view, I feel that they’ve served well in my personal learning experience. Each subject, not only urged me to develop my understanding of the Dutch culture, but also encouraged me to reflect on my own culture and my own personal convictions. All in all, I feel that these subjects have been successful in obtaining me an insight over the Dutch identity and world view, as well as assisting me in defining "who I am" in regards to America and to the Netherlands.
"Good practice" means taking risks. If I knew how to say it in Dutch, I said it in Dutch! I took the liberty to contact the buddies of the N-SPICE program in order to practice my Dutch conversational skills. I found this to be most rewarding. Not only was I able to practice my Dutch, but I was also able to interact and make friends with students of the Dutch European culture. As the minority, it was not always fun playing "follow the leader"; however, trial-and-error usually does not go hand-in-hand with the terms fun and exciting! Though, it is quite amusing for them, as it is for me, to hear people make foolish mistakes in their grammar or word pronunciation. Getting involved with Dutch students has probably been the most rewarding of my experiences because they are of my generation. We have that in common and, as I see it, such denominators are essential to forming relationships.
This experience was more than a trip across an ocean, it was a novel revision! I did not expect to have been plunged into this culture as I had been through portfolio. Each subject wrought educational development and personal development. I was able to form, through these subjects, perspectives over Dutch, American, and personal identity. By far the most recognizable accomplishment of mine is self-discovery. Metaphorically speaking, I am a text, taken out of context, which is (usually) a pretext for trouble. I left "my place" and shoved myself into a new environment that was not at all like "my place". It forced me to realize things about me that I had previously neglected or ignored. I learned a great deal of "who I am" and where I plan to go. All of these things, combined, are what consummate my identity. Conclusively, my attitude of indifference, my often negligent communication style, my unaltered convictions, my go-getter drive, and my faith in God all continue to be a part of me. Some of these basic aspects of my identity have undergone minor changes, for a 180 degree turn around is not very logical in a span of four months. The changes that I have undergone, I know, have made me stronger and, perhaps, wiser than before I had come on this program. However, I will not know precisely how developed I have become until I return to my home. After four months of living in a Dutch lifestyle, integrating with the Dutch people, and experiencing the Dutch culture, I find if difficult to see myself back in America, or to even begin to imagine how different I will be when I am again exposed to my home situation. I am excited to share my learning experiences with my family. I only hope that they too, can notice a significant change in my attitude and intellect. Time will tell.
dinsdag 24 april 2007
vrijdag 20 april 2007
Portfolio File 5: Up to Date Events
1. Selection of Actual Events
-- Conflict in Afghanistan
-- Immigration: morocans and islamics (in particular)
-- Global Warming
2. Interview
Specific Event
1. What is your position on the conflicts in Afghanistan?
-- I think, as world citizens, we have a responsibility for what happens in the rest of the world. I think that it is important to be involved, but the problem with organizations like the UN aren't always conscious of exactly HOW to go about intervening. Foreign aid should be helping the local community. It has to fit with the local norms and values of the country for which they are helping. As military powers, we should create a safe environment, a safe home, for those living in such areas. Democracy doesn't work for everyone and we should accept that and not try to conform other countries to our way of governing our citizens because we think it works best.
2. Do you feel like these conflicts are relevent to the Netherlands?
-- Everything happening in the world is relevent to the Netherlands, especially when the Dutch are involved. Think about terrorism. A lot of terrorism starts in countries like Afghanistan because the teen population is supressed and they push for power. It is good for us to take action and get involved to prevent worse things from happening.
3. Tell a little bit about this issue.
-- I feel like the Dutch military is trying to opress the taliban members and understand the lifestyle of these peoples so that they may be of help. It really sucks when you hear that a Dutch soldier died in action. It makes me aware of the reality of what's going on abroad.
Broad Topic
1. What is your position when it comes to Immigration?
-- People are welcome to settle here. By all means, come...but the Netherlands is a little too open to immigration. The Netherlands is TOO easy going. I think we need to be more like America and make it more difficult for foreigners to obtain a citizenship.
-- I think immigration on itself is a possitive thing, but I also think it is important that if you decide to move to another country, you must integrate with the native Dutch, learn the Dutch language and law system and have respect for the Dutch culture. I think people have to respect the diversity here and the law system we have.
-- Well, I think the Islamic culture views us as hookers. The Islamic woman is everything and they are seeing us a very lose moralled people and you can sense this when you are going out and dancing at the discotec and the first man that will come to you is often an Islamic boy. When you refuse them, they become agressive. They do not understand our culture and often refuse to adapt to it. But that is in their nature because of their parents and their own cultural influences. The Netherlands is FREE. Islamic girls are not as free. Dutch girls are too free for Islamic girls, and that is where the stereotypes come in.
2. Do you feel that Immigration is a relevant event for Nederlanders?
-- Yes. The Netherlands, like America, has a lot of freedom, so in a sense it encourages immigration.
-- Of course. We have always been a country in which many immigrants come and many citizens go.
-- I think that it really has to do with culture. We do not have so much of a problem with the Chinese immigrants as much as with the Islamic immigrants. The Chinese still do not adapt to the Dutch culture, but they respect the Dutch more so than the most people.
3. Evaluate foreign Immigration.
-- We need to control immigration more. It's rediculous to have so many minorities and live in fear of being taken over. Our country needs to be predominantly Dutch.
-- If you want to summarize it in one word, I am possitive about it. I am not against it.
-- Stop it! It´s really enough! We have enough citizens and we lose our culture to them because they are populating the Netherlands more and more. I like being able to talk to them, but they really do not have to start conflict. Quit going extreme! When people step over the line--become agressive, fight, etc--get them back to their own country!
-- Conflict in Afghanistan
-- Immigration: morocans and islamics (in particular)
-- Global Warming
2. Interview
Specific Event
1. What is your position on the conflicts in Afghanistan?
-- I think, as world citizens, we have a responsibility for what happens in the rest of the world. I think that it is important to be involved, but the problem with organizations like the UN aren't always conscious of exactly HOW to go about intervening. Foreign aid should be helping the local community. It has to fit with the local norms and values of the country for which they are helping. As military powers, we should create a safe environment, a safe home, for those living in such areas. Democracy doesn't work for everyone and we should accept that and not try to conform other countries to our way of governing our citizens because we think it works best.
2. Do you feel like these conflicts are relevent to the Netherlands?
-- Everything happening in the world is relevent to the Netherlands, especially when the Dutch are involved. Think about terrorism. A lot of terrorism starts in countries like Afghanistan because the teen population is supressed and they push for power. It is good for us to take action and get involved to prevent worse things from happening.
3. Tell a little bit about this issue.
-- I feel like the Dutch military is trying to opress the taliban members and understand the lifestyle of these peoples so that they may be of help. It really sucks when you hear that a Dutch soldier died in action. It makes me aware of the reality of what's going on abroad.
Broad Topic
1. What is your position when it comes to Immigration?
-- People are welcome to settle here. By all means, come...but the Netherlands is a little too open to immigration. The Netherlands is TOO easy going. I think we need to be more like America and make it more difficult for foreigners to obtain a citizenship.
-- I think immigration on itself is a possitive thing, but I also think it is important that if you decide to move to another country, you must integrate with the native Dutch, learn the Dutch language and law system and have respect for the Dutch culture. I think people have to respect the diversity here and the law system we have.
-- Well, I think the Islamic culture views us as hookers. The Islamic woman is everything and they are seeing us a very lose moralled people and you can sense this when you are going out and dancing at the discotec and the first man that will come to you is often an Islamic boy. When you refuse them, they become agressive. They do not understand our culture and often refuse to adapt to it. But that is in their nature because of their parents and their own cultural influences. The Netherlands is FREE. Islamic girls are not as free. Dutch girls are too free for Islamic girls, and that is where the stereotypes come in.
2. Do you feel that Immigration is a relevant event for Nederlanders?
-- Yes. The Netherlands, like America, has a lot of freedom, so in a sense it encourages immigration.
-- Of course. We have always been a country in which many immigrants come and many citizens go.
-- I think that it really has to do with culture. We do not have so much of a problem with the Chinese immigrants as much as with the Islamic immigrants. The Chinese still do not adapt to the Dutch culture, but they respect the Dutch more so than the most people.
3. Evaluate foreign Immigration.
-- We need to control immigration more. It's rediculous to have so many minorities and live in fear of being taken over. Our country needs to be predominantly Dutch.
-- If you want to summarize it in one word, I am possitive about it. I am not against it.
-- Stop it! It´s really enough! We have enough citizens and we lose our culture to them because they are populating the Netherlands more and more. I like being able to talk to them, but they really do not have to start conflict. Quit going extreme! When people step over the line--become agressive, fight, etc--get them back to their own country!
Just for Fun!!
1. How do you feel about the issue of global warming? (Is it practical?)
-- Well, we can't control it. The earth is going down. There is traffic everywhere. Be afraid.
-- I think it should motivate us to take good care of the environment, but its not something that I am worrying about. I do what I can do to limit the effects of global warming.
-- The whole worlds problem that started a long long time ago. We accelerate the progess.
2. Do you feel global warming is relevent to the Netherlands?
-- It's relevent to the world. So, yes it is also relevent to the Netherlands.
-- Of course. When the ice bergs melt, we're going to have a serious problem with water. Look where we're at now! Below the sea!
-- To the world. People who contribute to the effects of global warming.
3. Evaluate global warming.
-- It's unavoidable. It's not like we're going to stop using cars.
-- Its a common problem we must be aware of. It's a world problem. If the Dutch stopped driving, its not going to stop global warming. You have to get the world to change. It is important to work towards a change.
-- We can use lightbulbs that use less engergy, use the car less (or improve them), do not leave electronics on standby, etc. The government is going to have to work on focusing on environmentally safe transportation.
3. Judgement and Conclusions
a) Meestal alle mensen gezegt: "Ik vind immigratie goed wanneer ze onze cultuur respecteren. Ze zijn hier te gast en horen zich als gast te gedragen. We respecteren hun cultuur maar, ze zullen onze cultuur ook moeten respecteren. Ze moeten bijvoorbeeld niet komen met het is "ons cultuur" want, ze zijn in ons land. Zelf vind ik ander cultuur erg interessant over hoe het er in hun cultuur aangaat maar, zoals ik eerder heb verteld, ze zullen zich moeten aanpassen aan ons cultuur. Vooral het voorval van 9-11 heeft ons aan het denken gezet. We zijn er banger voor geworden. Doordat de Nederlandse regering heeft toegeven aan het "generaal pardon" zijn we nog banger geworden maar, we zijn erg nuchter en leggen ons er bij neer. Het is aan het Nederlandse volk wat we er mee doen."
b) Immigratie is belangrijk voor de nederlanders omdat veel buitenlanders komen naar nederland. Ze willen hier wonen, maar niet nederlands leren. Ze komen bijvoorbeld met het is "ons cultuur" want. Dat is niet goed hoor. Ze zijn in nederland, dus ze moeten nederlands cultuur respecteren. Als ze willen nederlanders worden, dan passen ze nederlands cultuur aan.
Over oorlog buitenland, het is depressief maar, nodig hebben. De eerste wereld landen moeten actie nemen. Het is ons verantwoordelijkheid.
c) Immigratie is ook een amerikaanse probleem. Mexicanen komen naar amerika elke dag. Amerika heeft nu heel veel wat mexicanen die daar zonder toestemming blijven. Verder, heeft amerika kleine gemeenschappen die van andere delen van de wereld leven. Die mensen ook passen niet van amerikaan cultuur aan. Soms wordt dit een probleem.
4. Your Mental Model
-- Immigration applies to both America and the Netherlands. I've noticed, though, that the Netherlands seems to be adapting some of our strict immigration policies, which could help solve the "issues" that go along with this specific event. We are so used to Mexicans crossing into our country that it's no longer news for us, nor does anybody seem to really care until it becomes a problem. As for military action in Afghanistan, the US military is also their, isn't it? We all suffer losses, and it does become personal when it is one of our own men. I feel like, because it is too much of a "foreign affair" to me, I do not have as much of an interst in the matters of war. I wish I could say that it hurts me to know that an American soldier died, but so many die every day, at it is, in a sense, a part of their job, to put themselves at risk of death...Man I feel so heartless in saying this, but having a soldier die doesn't have as much of an impact on my emotions as hearing of a school shooting in which various innocent students were shot and killled for no apparent reason. Deaths should be equally mourned, but for some odd reason, student deaths hit closer to home than the death of a soldier abroad. Global warming--I know its an issue, and I also know that I do not have the brains to discover a solution to the problem, so I sit back and wait for the cure so to speak. I find it amuzing how often the Dutch speak about global warming. The answer is always global warming!
5. Reflection of Studytrips and Excursions
-- see <http://nspice5.blogspot.com/>
6. Personal Plan of Development
-- Looking back at my PPD from the beginning of the year I know that I have committed to my goals. My first goal was to improve my Dutch conversational skills. Even though, to me, it seems like I haven't improved much, others around me constantly comment on my ability to understand Dutch and speak it when I know how to say what it is I want to say. Over the past four months, I forced myself to use the Dutch language whenever an opportunity knocked. For example, on the street, or in a store, and even on the trains, when I had a question, I asked it in Dutch, and if I did not understand their answer, I asked them to please, repeat it in English or speak a bit slower. I found that this method worked well for me. I even catch myself speaking in Dutch to my friends from America on occasion. Oh yeah, and I almost forgot. I've met many Dutch students and my Dutch cousins and every time I spend time with them, I try to go the whole time speaking only Dutch (of course, it doesn't always work because my Dutch vocabulary is very limited yet, but it forced me to participate in Dutch converstations.)
My second goal was to become closer to God. This is not an easy task. I found it very difficult to keep myself motivated in reading the bible, but I tried to at least read a chapter a day and pray before bed. It's not like I've experienced a spiritual revelation or anything, but I know that I have at least laid the foundation for having God be a part of my life. It just takes time and committment now. Change usually does not happen over night.
My third goal was to make relationships with Dutch students so that I could experience Dutch student-life before my study in Middelburg this coming fall. Again, I have succeeded. I have a number of Dutch "buddies" ;) that I spend time with and chat with online. Bienke, Janbart, Femmie, Merith, Mirjam, Mirjam, Enneke, and a couple of others. It's great to make new friends and to practice my Dutch conversational skills with them every chance that I get. English is not easy for everyone of these "buddies" so it's nice for them to have an American student interested in their language. We have a mutual agreement when it comes to language.
My fourth goal was to learn more about the Dutch identity and the American identity. This was definitely a challenge, mostly because it is not learned from a book. I found that it was crucial to immerse myself in the Dutch culture and to really be mindful of the people around me in order to grasp an idea of what made these people Dutch and what made ME American. Simply observing was not enough either. I had to debate with these Dutchfolk. I had to hang out with them, talk with them, laugh with them, etc. I had to learn them! I do not feel like I've developed a clear understanding of the Dutch identity and I feel like I have also broke down some stereotypes of the American identity and perhaps replaced them with new ones. However, I do know this: de Nederlander and the American will never be the same.
My final goal was to obtain a more accurate self-concept, personal identity. I've found my complexities to be confusing at times; having a difficult time understanding why I do the things that I do, why I value the things that I value, and why I have some of the convictions I have? Over the past four months, I've kept a personal journal, a personal self-reflection. I've taken note of things that happened in the past and compared them with things that were happening to me in the present. I've made connections and theories. I've developed a new philosophy pertaining only to myself, but I know it's true. My goal to find my identity is not complete, for I am not complete. I am still changing, but I know now, through all of my journalings, some of the reasons why I am the way that I am. I've also learned through my experiences and my committment to God, that I do not have to lose hope in my future because I am not as bad as I often claim to be. Even Godly men, men after God's own heart, had committed awful sins. Sins that I wouldn't dream of committing, but they were with God. They confessed these sins to God. I've found a comfort in my life: God. Without God, I would only dwell on the sins I have committed and I would rot in them. With God, I can know that I can be forgiven and I can LEARN from these heavy barrings that I CAN change and I will change through Him. Finding myself was more so finding my God. I had to stop living for myself everyday and start living for the one that GAVE ME LIFE! Knowing this, however, does not make it easy. It's a life-long stuggle. Sin will always seperate me from God, but I can fight! I can chose to commit to Him. I am His, not my own.
7. Asking for Feedback
dinsdag 27 maart 2007
Portfolio File 4: Political and spiritual movements in the Netherlands
1. Interview
1. What are the most important political and spiritual movements in the Netherlands?
-- Political, at this moment, the “SP”. Spiritual, I don’t have a clue.
-- Political, that our national government currently includes a Christian party. Spiritual, that there is more unity in the churches now, walls between some churches are disappearing.
-- Politcal, health care, school, immigration...
-- I think the "christen unie" is a very important movement at the moment because they are in the cabinet so they are leading our country now, and you've got the PKN which is a movement thats leading most of the Christian churches. I don't like it because I voted VVD, which is more right, and our goverment now is more left.
--
2. Why are these movements the most important, in your opinion?
-- The “SP” is the fastest growing political group.
-- Im curious how the new government is going to influence Holland. Secondly, because I think that Christians are a minority and we shouldn't argue with each other, rather we should focus on what we have in common so that we can become a true testamony in our society.
-- Because people are scared and the immigrants are taking away a lot of our juobs.
-- They are in the cabinet. They lead the country.
--
3. What are the most actual changes in political and spiritual movements?
-- I don't have a clue.
-- Politically, the new government was just installed. We have a party now for family affairs so that may influence the Netherlands. When it comes to spiritual, a lot of young people are touched by God and the Holy Spirit. A lot of organizations are started for and by young Christian adults.
-- Everybody before seven years ago had a Dutch nationality/residence permit, but now there are many immigrants.
--
--
4. In what way do you judge these changes?
-- Sorry.
-- I'm happy with the inclusion of the Christian view in the government. I see it as very possitive, although some will not because it effects their norms and values. They have to cooperate with these different views, but I'm glad that this worldview is seen now in our country. As for the young adults, they can influence the world now and in the future. Having the youth inspired by God is crucial to getting the Word of God recognized in generations to come.
-- Not good!
--
--
5. List your motives and arguments.
-- I'm really not into politics.
-- I'm just happy that people who have a heart for God are now seen in society so that they can feel more open to reach out to others. Having the government instigate Christian views helps encourage the spread of Christianity.
-- Well, fear for our country becoming over populated with immigrants. We are losing our Dutch culture to foreign cultures living in our country.
--
--
2. Interview2
History of the Movement:
--
--
Ideology:
--
--
Mission/Goals:
--
--
Stucture of Organization:
--
--
Number of Members:
--
--
Criteria for Membership:
--
--
Span of Influence on the Netherlands:
--
--
Specific Christian Elements:
--
--
3. Judgement and Conclusion
a. I have bad luck with these interview things. Everybody I talked to seemed to be Christian or supporting the Christian parties. It's rediculous!
4. Mental Model
-- I learned that I have a lot of homework to do before I can ever understand the politics of a country. If I cannot grasp a two-party system of a country I was born and raised in, how can I even begin to understand a multi-party system of a land foreign to me?
5. Reflection of Studytrips and Excursions
The trip to paliament was long and tiring. Sitting in the counsel room with one of the spokespersons from the CDA was interesting. I enjoyed listening to her story, mostly because she is a lot like us. She is just as Dutch as we are, in the sense of nationality. It was interesting and comforting to hear her say that she also cannot truly define the Netherlands. The constitution of the Netherlands is all that can really define the country. With all the minorities and pillarized political system, it's hard to say what the Netherlands stands for exactly, accept for what is accounted for in the constitution, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of choice, etc. The freedoms, the liberal-ness is what best outlines the Dutch identity in respect to its political system.
The library was impressive. The Chinese influence is rather astonishing. I love the beauty of the Chinese art and architecture. It is rare and cultural and resembles something you'd expect to see in the movies. Beautiful!
6. Personal Plan of Development
-- Personally, this file makes me feel 50% stupider than I did coming on this trip. I wouldn't know how to answer these questions about my own countries politics and spiritual movements. Perhaps there isn't one way to answer these questions. As for my personal plan of development, I do not care to be more engaged in politics than I already am, so it really is not an interest of mine to develop a better understanding of something that I hold very little interst in. I'm sure I should take politics seriously, but I do not feel as though I am being governed unjustly under the current government. Nobody is controlling my worldview and choice making process. Why should I bother about the fundamentals? I don't know. Sure, I vote. And I use my personal convictions in doing so, but that is not going to change the world. There will always be black markets and murders as long as the devil
... the devil. sometimes christianity throws me off. it's not really the devil that is working against my favor. this world is somewhat a devil. this world is full of temptations. it is my choice to be a part of it, or to resist it. hmmm... i fear my own convictions sometimes. i don't want to believe the things that my mind devises. i am afraid that if i believe something of my own mind, that does not agree with the church, that i am signing myself away to the devil. i think perhaps everyone is afraid of their own mind's convictions...that may be why we are told to follow our hearts. but can those be so poisoned by our minds? they inevitably dwell together, thus influence each other greatly, yes? so...where do we go, but to God?
God is here. even in this secular country, i can see God's handywork. de land hier is iets anders dan amerika en ik vind het heel erg mooi. de mensen, de bomen, de zee, ik vind alles leuk.
as for that development plan, i feel isolated. how can i grow without peer pressure? i have somewhat of a social life -- once a week -- but still then, i do not feel challenged to grow. i know that i am still weak spirited, but i also know that i've become much stronger. it's learning to be ok -- more than just ok -- with who i chose to be and who God has created me as. even in the confusion of desires, i know that all i need to do is keep my eyes on God and his will for my life.
every vote counts. i vote for what may be considerably best for the people of this WORLD (not just America)!
7. Asking for Feedback
1. What are the most important political and spiritual movements in the Netherlands?
-- Political, at this moment, the “SP”. Spiritual, I don’t have a clue.
-- Political, that our national government currently includes a Christian party. Spiritual, that there is more unity in the churches now, walls between some churches are disappearing.
-- Politcal, health care, school, immigration...
-- I think the "christen unie" is a very important movement at the moment because they are in the cabinet so they are leading our country now, and you've got the PKN which is a movement thats leading most of the Christian churches. I don't like it because I voted VVD, which is more right, and our goverment now is more left.
--
2. Why are these movements the most important, in your opinion?
-- The “SP” is the fastest growing political group.
-- Im curious how the new government is going to influence Holland. Secondly, because I think that Christians are a minority and we shouldn't argue with each other, rather we should focus on what we have in common so that we can become a true testamony in our society.
-- Because people are scared and the immigrants are taking away a lot of our juobs.
-- They are in the cabinet. They lead the country.
--
3. What are the most actual changes in political and spiritual movements?
-- I don't have a clue.
-- Politically, the new government was just installed. We have a party now for family affairs so that may influence the Netherlands. When it comes to spiritual, a lot of young people are touched by God and the Holy Spirit. A lot of organizations are started for and by young Christian adults.
-- Everybody before seven years ago had a Dutch nationality/residence permit, but now there are many immigrants.
--
--
4. In what way do you judge these changes?
-- Sorry.
-- I'm happy with the inclusion of the Christian view in the government. I see it as very possitive, although some will not because it effects their norms and values. They have to cooperate with these different views, but I'm glad that this worldview is seen now in our country. As for the young adults, they can influence the world now and in the future. Having the youth inspired by God is crucial to getting the Word of God recognized in generations to come.
-- Not good!
--
--
5. List your motives and arguments.
-- I'm really not into politics.
-- I'm just happy that people who have a heart for God are now seen in society so that they can feel more open to reach out to others. Having the government instigate Christian views helps encourage the spread of Christianity.
-- Well, fear for our country becoming over populated with immigrants. We are losing our Dutch culture to foreign cultures living in our country.
--
--
2. Interview2
History of the Movement:
--
--
Ideology:
--
--
Mission/Goals:
--
--
Stucture of Organization:
--
--
Number of Members:
--
--
Criteria for Membership:
--
--
Span of Influence on the Netherlands:
--
--
Specific Christian Elements:
--
--
3. Judgement and Conclusion
a. I have bad luck with these interview things. Everybody I talked to seemed to be Christian or supporting the Christian parties. It's rediculous!
4. Mental Model
-- I learned that I have a lot of homework to do before I can ever understand the politics of a country. If I cannot grasp a two-party system of a country I was born and raised in, how can I even begin to understand a multi-party system of a land foreign to me?
5. Reflection of Studytrips and Excursions
The trip to paliament was long and tiring. Sitting in the counsel room with one of the spokespersons from the CDA was interesting. I enjoyed listening to her story, mostly because she is a lot like us. She is just as Dutch as we are, in the sense of nationality. It was interesting and comforting to hear her say that she also cannot truly define the Netherlands. The constitution of the Netherlands is all that can really define the country. With all the minorities and pillarized political system, it's hard to say what the Netherlands stands for exactly, accept for what is accounted for in the constitution, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of choice, etc. The freedoms, the liberal-ness is what best outlines the Dutch identity in respect to its political system.
The library was impressive. The Chinese influence is rather astonishing. I love the beauty of the Chinese art and architecture. It is rare and cultural and resembles something you'd expect to see in the movies. Beautiful!
6. Personal Plan of Development
-- Personally, this file makes me feel 50% stupider than I did coming on this trip. I wouldn't know how to answer these questions about my own countries politics and spiritual movements. Perhaps there isn't one way to answer these questions. As for my personal plan of development, I do not care to be more engaged in politics than I already am, so it really is not an interest of mine to develop a better understanding of something that I hold very little interst in. I'm sure I should take politics seriously, but I do not feel as though I am being governed unjustly under the current government. Nobody is controlling my worldview and choice making process. Why should I bother about the fundamentals? I don't know. Sure, I vote. And I use my personal convictions in doing so, but that is not going to change the world. There will always be black markets and murders as long as the devil
... the devil. sometimes christianity throws me off. it's not really the devil that is working against my favor. this world is somewhat a devil. this world is full of temptations. it is my choice to be a part of it, or to resist it. hmmm... i fear my own convictions sometimes. i don't want to believe the things that my mind devises. i am afraid that if i believe something of my own mind, that does not agree with the church, that i am signing myself away to the devil. i think perhaps everyone is afraid of their own mind's convictions...that may be why we are told to follow our hearts. but can those be so poisoned by our minds? they inevitably dwell together, thus influence each other greatly, yes? so...where do we go, but to God?
God is here. even in this secular country, i can see God's handywork. de land hier is iets anders dan amerika en ik vind het heel erg mooi. de mensen, de bomen, de zee, ik vind alles leuk.
as for that development plan, i feel isolated. how can i grow without peer pressure? i have somewhat of a social life -- once a week -- but still then, i do not feel challenged to grow. i know that i am still weak spirited, but i also know that i've become much stronger. it's learning to be ok -- more than just ok -- with who i chose to be and who God has created me as. even in the confusion of desires, i know that all i need to do is keep my eyes on God and his will for my life.
every vote counts. i vote for what may be considerably best for the people of this WORLD (not just America)!
7. Asking for Feedback
woensdag 14 maart 2007
Portfolio File 3: Is the Netherlands a Christian Society
1. Reflection Assignment
-
2a. Observations
- (on-going observation) My house-mate lives and breathes Christianity. For every problem, God is the solution. We’ve had discussions about religion. She has Muslim friends that are living here in the Netherlands, so it is very apparent that Christianity is not the dominant surviving religion in this small country. However, politically speaking, the CDA (Christian party) holds the most number of chairs in parliament, (keep in mind that “the most” is still under 25 percent of parliament.) She voted CU (Christian Union). Because I have been struggling with my faith, it is easy for me to generalize Christianity as ignorant bliss. So often I feel like Christians credit God for things that (in my head) are normal life occurrences and God doesn’t make a difference, OR, they praise God for things that simply are life. I can see the “foolishness” of Christian belief and understand why many people disregard this faith. It’s something that I have disregarded for years and it is still something that I continually struggle with. Am I CHEESY or what?! Asking God for peace of mind, asking God to rid me of my will so that I might follow His, asking God to step in and interfere with my convictions, asking God to reveal Himself and to help me feel His love for me so that I might be able to draw near to Him, telling God I’ve fallen short of myself, of Him, and of others around me. It’s poppycock really. I get so annoyed with all this “romanticism”. It seems too surreal, too easy! Anyways, as a Christian, it is not right to judge/make judgements. I feel so strange writing this all because I feel like I am decided what is and what is NOT Christian and that is NOT for me to decide. Even at home, that is not for me to decided. This file really grinds my gears. I don’t want to make comparisons between how Christian is here or there. It isn’t important HOW we are, it’s what we are and what we personally believe. I’m on the outside. I’m looking in. I can see the same God working here as there. Must there really be a difference? Then again, I do notice something I value more about the Dutch Christianity. Where I grew up Christianity was about rules, tradition, religion. Here, or at least with the de Jong family, Christianity is about personal relationship with God (as it is at the church I attend back home now.) Christianity here is not about the “do not”, “cannot”, “should not”, “you must” etc. It’s about the “do I”, “can I”, “should I”, “may I”, etc. It’s about how God speaks to YOU personally, not how God speaks to the church, the organization of believers.
- The neighborhood. How should I say this? It’s definitely a neighborhood of minorities. I wouldn’t dare say that 25% of the neighborhood is a professed believer, then again, I do not know the neighbors on such a personal basis, so I cannot justify this observation as fact. I know that there are Muslims living in the flats nearby and that I rarely even see my neighbors because their lives are very busy, however, I can say that I have not once seen my neighbors leave for an early morning church service. The neighborhood is dead for a flat residence. The only time I see them is when they are smoking on their balconies.
- During the GH celebration we viewed a filmed interview of residents from Zwolle and in this interview a mere 7% of those interviewed declared being a born-again believer. This is pretty sad. Students attending the GH are definitely a minority here in Zwolle where Christianity appears to be a dominant religion. It’s hard to say, though, because it is not necessary to be a believer to have Christian moral. When I look out at Zwolle, I see a town like any other town–churches, shops, houses, old buildings and new, a fast-paced society. Conclusions based on norms is ridiculous. Certainly all Christians vary, I cannot judge any one based on my own understanding. Maybe I have a wrong idea of what is Christian.
2b. Interview
1. Do you think that the Netherlands is a Christian society? Give examples, reasons to back your opinion.- No, well, in a way. Christian’s now-a-days are a minority. The laws are not necessarily Christian—based on thoughts from the bible. There are so many different religions in the Netherlands so you cannot say that the Dutch are Christian, BUT you can still sense that we have a Christian background, but I wouldn’t consider the Netherlands as a Christian society.
- Not at ALL. We have Christian communities within the Netherlands, but the Netherlands SOCIETY is not Christian. Our government has Christian parties, but it is not founded on Christian disciplines. For example, there are the liberals, the Catholics, the Protestants, and there are Muslims all living in the Netherlands freely. The Christians are only a small part of the Netherlands so that cannot be possible. Definitely not.- A Christian society? No. I’m a liberal. My friends and I all voted VVD. It’s one of the largest political parties in the Netherlands and it is NOT Christian. Plus, even if the “Christian” party is elected into government, it alone cannot fill the seats of parliament, so it can never be our government. It simply cannot happen. The Netherlands will never be a Christian society.
-That’s a tough question. Ummm… The Netherlands is not a Christian society. There are a lot of church members, but a lot less confessed believers. When you are a Christian society, would there be gay marriages and prostitution? I feel that everyone is looking towards their own well-being and in that way there is no Christian society. There small groups of Christians cannot possibly represent the Netherlands society.
2c. Conclusion
a) To what extent is the Netherlands a Christian society? To what extent is America a Christian society? This question is illogical. In my opinion, the Netherlands is only as Christian as it’s citizens—but what constitutes Christian? This goes for every country. A society can only be as Christian as its dwellers. Because the Netherlands is such a country of minorities and such a small fraction of the citizens actually proclaim to be Christian, you cannot have a Christian society. But then, could you go on to argue, that even though they are not proclaimed Christians, EVERYBODY has a Christian moral sense, planted in them by God, thus all persons have a Christian-ness to them? Besides, is it a Christian society based on Christian standardized teachings (the laws and the doctrines) or is it a Christian society based on the values and behaviors of the citizens? I will deviate from this last suggestion for it is irrelevant.
b/c) American Society vs Dutch Society: Supposedly America is founded on Christian moral. Much of the Constitution is considered “Christian” in the sense that if protects the freedoms of it’s citizens and God created us free. It also suggests certain moral behavior, taking action against uncivilized actions, such as murder and theft. However, America is NOT a Christian society. So many Americans are prejudice and proud. So many citizens are liberals or from other religious backgrounds. In a sense, religiously speaking, the Netherlands and American are somewhat the same. Many religions survive within the borders, for freedom of religion is supported by both governments, but America only seems to be more Christian in the sense that our government protects against prostitution, homosexual marriage, drug use, etc.
d) Conclusion: Religious-wise, these two societies are comparably similar. American and Nederland both have a number of surviving religions within the boarders of their land; however, because the American constitution is somewhat founded on Christian morale, America tends to be a bit more “Christian oriented” in the sense that you kill someone, you either spend life in prison or serve a death sentence–you go against moral behavior and you serve the consequence with equal or similar punishment. I dare not say that it is the Christian moral of the US Constitution that prohibits such things as drugs and prostitution as it is more the concept of health and protection—or—it could also be the moral of society itself; what is accepted culturally is accepted personally.
3. Your Mental Model
- I’ve realized that there are different approaches to defining what makes a society Christian. Everyone has his or her own concept of what is and what is not Christian. Do you argue for church law being the fundamental basis for Christian society or do you argue for moral behavior and Christ-like attitude of the residents of the society? I suppose persons generalize Christian societies as communities based on the Christian religion (not faith, personalization). So, that stated, a Christian society is full of judgmental persons--persons who are disinclined to accept persons who fall beyond the borders of ideal Christian behavior. Christian societies are supported by the church and by the organization of the church and it’s laws. But I don’t necessarily believe this either. An ideal Christian society cannot exist. For with all the differing views and opinions that are even amongst believers, no place can adapt a Christian identity, for what, may I ask, is Christian? Is it the mannerisms of the congregation (the people/the believers) or is it the function and role of the organized church (the religion)?
4. Reflection of Study-trips and Excursions
- The Jewish Synagogue was basically identical to the last Jewish synagogue I visited, only with a bit more lamentation for those that lost their lives in the war.
5. Personal Plan of Development
- God is revealed to me in strange ways.
- My Dutch speaking skills, I think, have improved some since I have been on the program.
- I haven't been able to meet any Dutch students yet. They all seem to be far busier than I am and do not have the time to hang out and spend time with a silly American woman like myself, though I do have plans to meet with a couple of the N-SPICE buddies, so...we will see how everything goes.
6. Asking for Feedback
- Christianity and the Netherlands. That is the question. Well, I would like to start by saying that BECAUSE the Netherlands was once founded on Christian doctrine it is hard to disregard Christian-ness 100% in the Netherlands. I believe that, theoretically, one can argue that the pluralistic society of the Netherlands is Christian in a sense. Why? Because God gave us a freedom of choice and to have a unified nation is a violation of our God-given right! But that supports, more so, the idea of Christian-like behavior rather than Christian traditionalistic stature. So, Christianity as the religion, as the organization, cannot be associated with the Dutch society. Why? Because Christian law and doctrine no longer cooperates with the state (government) and the Netherlands is certainly a liberal country.
-
2a. Observations
- (on-going observation) My house-mate lives and breathes Christianity. For every problem, God is the solution. We’ve had discussions about religion. She has Muslim friends that are living here in the Netherlands, so it is very apparent that Christianity is not the dominant surviving religion in this small country. However, politically speaking, the CDA (Christian party) holds the most number of chairs in parliament, (keep in mind that “the most” is still under 25 percent of parliament.) She voted CU (Christian Union). Because I have been struggling with my faith, it is easy for me to generalize Christianity as ignorant bliss. So often I feel like Christians credit God for things that (in my head) are normal life occurrences and God doesn’t make a difference, OR, they praise God for things that simply are life. I can see the “foolishness” of Christian belief and understand why many people disregard this faith. It’s something that I have disregarded for years and it is still something that I continually struggle with. Am I CHEESY or what?! Asking God for peace of mind, asking God to rid me of my will so that I might follow His, asking God to step in and interfere with my convictions, asking God to reveal Himself and to help me feel His love for me so that I might be able to draw near to Him, telling God I’ve fallen short of myself, of Him, and of others around me. It’s poppycock really. I get so annoyed with all this “romanticism”. It seems too surreal, too easy! Anyways, as a Christian, it is not right to judge/make judgements. I feel so strange writing this all because I feel like I am decided what is and what is NOT Christian and that is NOT for me to decide. Even at home, that is not for me to decided. This file really grinds my gears. I don’t want to make comparisons between how Christian is here or there. It isn’t important HOW we are, it’s what we are and what we personally believe. I’m on the outside. I’m looking in. I can see the same God working here as there. Must there really be a difference? Then again, I do notice something I value more about the Dutch Christianity. Where I grew up Christianity was about rules, tradition, religion. Here, or at least with the de Jong family, Christianity is about personal relationship with God (as it is at the church I attend back home now.) Christianity here is not about the “do not”, “cannot”, “should not”, “you must” etc. It’s about the “do I”, “can I”, “should I”, “may I”, etc. It’s about how God speaks to YOU personally, not how God speaks to the church, the organization of believers.
- The neighborhood. How should I say this? It’s definitely a neighborhood of minorities. I wouldn’t dare say that 25% of the neighborhood is a professed believer, then again, I do not know the neighbors on such a personal basis, so I cannot justify this observation as fact. I know that there are Muslims living in the flats nearby and that I rarely even see my neighbors because their lives are very busy, however, I can say that I have not once seen my neighbors leave for an early morning church service. The neighborhood is dead for a flat residence. The only time I see them is when they are smoking on their balconies.
- During the GH celebration we viewed a filmed interview of residents from Zwolle and in this interview a mere 7% of those interviewed declared being a born-again believer. This is pretty sad. Students attending the GH are definitely a minority here in Zwolle where Christianity appears to be a dominant religion. It’s hard to say, though, because it is not necessary to be a believer to have Christian moral. When I look out at Zwolle, I see a town like any other town–churches, shops, houses, old buildings and new, a fast-paced society. Conclusions based on norms is ridiculous. Certainly all Christians vary, I cannot judge any one based on my own understanding. Maybe I have a wrong idea of what is Christian.
2b. Interview
1. Do you think that the Netherlands is a Christian society? Give examples, reasons to back your opinion.- No, well, in a way. Christian’s now-a-days are a minority. The laws are not necessarily Christian—based on thoughts from the bible. There are so many different religions in the Netherlands so you cannot say that the Dutch are Christian, BUT you can still sense that we have a Christian background, but I wouldn’t consider the Netherlands as a Christian society.
- Not at ALL. We have Christian communities within the Netherlands, but the Netherlands SOCIETY is not Christian. Our government has Christian parties, but it is not founded on Christian disciplines. For example, there are the liberals, the Catholics, the Protestants, and there are Muslims all living in the Netherlands freely. The Christians are only a small part of the Netherlands so that cannot be possible. Definitely not.- A Christian society? No. I’m a liberal. My friends and I all voted VVD. It’s one of the largest political parties in the Netherlands and it is NOT Christian. Plus, even if the “Christian” party is elected into government, it alone cannot fill the seats of parliament, so it can never be our government. It simply cannot happen. The Netherlands will never be a Christian society.
-That’s a tough question. Ummm… The Netherlands is not a Christian society. There are a lot of church members, but a lot less confessed believers. When you are a Christian society, would there be gay marriages and prostitution? I feel that everyone is looking towards their own well-being and in that way there is no Christian society. There small groups of Christians cannot possibly represent the Netherlands society.
2c. Conclusion
a) To what extent is the Netherlands a Christian society? To what extent is America a Christian society? This question is illogical. In my opinion, the Netherlands is only as Christian as it’s citizens—but what constitutes Christian? This goes for every country. A society can only be as Christian as its dwellers. Because the Netherlands is such a country of minorities and such a small fraction of the citizens actually proclaim to be Christian, you cannot have a Christian society. But then, could you go on to argue, that even though they are not proclaimed Christians, EVERYBODY has a Christian moral sense, planted in them by God, thus all persons have a Christian-ness to them? Besides, is it a Christian society based on Christian standardized teachings (the laws and the doctrines) or is it a Christian society based on the values and behaviors of the citizens? I will deviate from this last suggestion for it is irrelevant.
b/c) American Society vs Dutch Society: Supposedly America is founded on Christian moral. Much of the Constitution is considered “Christian” in the sense that if protects the freedoms of it’s citizens and God created us free. It also suggests certain moral behavior, taking action against uncivilized actions, such as murder and theft. However, America is NOT a Christian society. So many Americans are prejudice and proud. So many citizens are liberals or from other religious backgrounds. In a sense, religiously speaking, the Netherlands and American are somewhat the same. Many religions survive within the borders, for freedom of religion is supported by both governments, but America only seems to be more Christian in the sense that our government protects against prostitution, homosexual marriage, drug use, etc.
d) Conclusion: Religious-wise, these two societies are comparably similar. American and Nederland both have a number of surviving religions within the boarders of their land; however, because the American constitution is somewhat founded on Christian morale, America tends to be a bit more “Christian oriented” in the sense that you kill someone, you either spend life in prison or serve a death sentence–you go against moral behavior and you serve the consequence with equal or similar punishment. I dare not say that it is the Christian moral of the US Constitution that prohibits such things as drugs and prostitution as it is more the concept of health and protection—or—it could also be the moral of society itself; what is accepted culturally is accepted personally.
3. Your Mental Model
- I’ve realized that there are different approaches to defining what makes a society Christian. Everyone has his or her own concept of what is and what is not Christian. Do you argue for church law being the fundamental basis for Christian society or do you argue for moral behavior and Christ-like attitude of the residents of the society? I suppose persons generalize Christian societies as communities based on the Christian religion (not faith, personalization). So, that stated, a Christian society is full of judgmental persons--persons who are disinclined to accept persons who fall beyond the borders of ideal Christian behavior. Christian societies are supported by the church and by the organization of the church and it’s laws. But I don’t necessarily believe this either. An ideal Christian society cannot exist. For with all the differing views and opinions that are even amongst believers, no place can adapt a Christian identity, for what, may I ask, is Christian? Is it the mannerisms of the congregation (the people/the believers) or is it the function and role of the organized church (the religion)?
4. Reflection of Study-trips and Excursions
- The Jewish Synagogue was basically identical to the last Jewish synagogue I visited, only with a bit more lamentation for those that lost their lives in the war.
5. Personal Plan of Development
- God is revealed to me in strange ways.
- My Dutch speaking skills, I think, have improved some since I have been on the program.
- I haven't been able to meet any Dutch students yet. They all seem to be far busier than I am and do not have the time to hang out and spend time with a silly American woman like myself, though I do have plans to meet with a couple of the N-SPICE buddies, so...we will see how everything goes.
6. Asking for Feedback
- Christianity and the Netherlands. That is the question. Well, I would like to start by saying that BECAUSE the Netherlands was once founded on Christian doctrine it is hard to disregard Christian-ness 100% in the Netherlands. I believe that, theoretically, one can argue that the pluralistic society of the Netherlands is Christian in a sense. Why? Because God gave us a freedom of choice and to have a unified nation is a violation of our God-given right! But that supports, more so, the idea of Christian-like behavior rather than Christian traditionalistic stature. So, Christianity as the religion, as the organization, cannot be associated with the Dutch society. Why? Because Christian law and doctrine no longer cooperates with the state (government) and the Netherlands is certainly a liberal country.
donderdag 22 februari 2007
Portfolio File 2: Education Here and There
1. Reflection Assignment
competency-based curriculum–emphasis on learning by experience, skill, practice, etc.
-ANALYZE DUTCH EDUCATION –nederlands dagblad, nrc, de volkskrant
2a. Observations
14-02-07 Greijndenus – Every student, in a way, is a “teacher’s pet” in the Dutch system.
Subject: care and well-being
-Small scale class of approximately 10-15 students. Teacher sat at a desk at the front of the class and the students sat in student desks facing the teacher. The students all had notebooks in front of them and the teacher was guiding them through the text.
Subject: chemistry
-Students worked in pairs of two with various chemicals–chemistry lab. I am assuming they were testing the reactions/results of mixing chemicals based on what they had learned about them in a textbook or formal lecture. I did not see the teacher.
Subject: business prep
-Some students worked at computers, others at desks reviewing textbook materials, and still others seemed to be neglecting the use of their time with irrelevant conversation. The teacher sat in the classroom, but was not instructing the students. The students more or less walked to their own beat. This class was a preparatory class for high school students to prepare for work after graduation. The purpose of the class was to teach students basic principles of business and management for various work-related situations. It appeared very un-organized. The teacher was not giving instructions, nor overseeing the work of the students.
Subject: unknown
-The students worked independently with power tools while the teacher came and went as desired. The students practiced safety and precision. They were intentional and very drawn to this way of learning. It appeared to be a trial and error-like simulation. Students are put to the test in skill and practice. I believe the emphasis of education is in the practical method of learning. Theoretical understanding is important, but only so if you can acquire skill and understanding in the field of practice. What good is the intellect you have acquired if you avoid practicing your knowledge and acquiring skill? I was envious of this classroom experience. I’ve missed out on education emphasizing the practical method of learning.
--Holland Christian High School offers classes with a minimum of 15 students–generally 22+ students. All classes focus on theory, with the exception of performing arts and fine arts courses, and occasional science labs. Generally the first 2 years of high school are mandatory liberal arts classes, the last 2 years of high school are more personal choice, though it is rare for students to deviate from the liberal arts study. Practical courses are offered for juniors and seniors at the local tech-center for students going into career fields immediately out of high school; cosmetology, dental assistance, physical/massage therapy, etc.
19-02-07 Gereformeerde Hogeschool
Subject: unknown; classroom in the basement
-Small scale class of approximately 12-14 students. Teacher does not stand at a podium, rather sits at desk level with the students. Teachers and students have a more direct–more personal–relationship with one another. Teachers do not have to ask questions to provoke responses and interest, students are equally involved in class discussions.
--Dordt college offers classes with a minimum of 15 students–generally 20+ students. The teacher lectures from a teachers guide textbook, and the students take notes based on the lectures. Teachers are their to teach, students are their to absorb the lecture, memorize it, and spit it back out on a test.
2b. Interview
1. What does it mean to attend class? Is it mandatory or recommended?
Teacher – Some classes are mandatory, some are optional–meant to be extra support. It depends on the class and the study program really.
Student – Recommended. Some classes are mandatory because if you do not attend you can’t do well on the exams.
Student – Some classes are required for taking and doing well on the tests. Not every study is equal, though. Class requirement/recommendation is subject to the study.
2. Give a brief explanation of the atmosphere you would find in a classroom.
Teacher – Most of the time its relaxed. It’s not very formal, but that could be because it is a small environment.
Student – It’s relaxed, some lectures are boring. The people and the interaction between students is relaxed.
Student – The classroom setting is not so gezellig... it’s actually quite boring.
3. In what way do teachers and students interact/communicate/relate?
Teacher – We strive to have a professional, personal relationship with each other. We think students can learn through personal relations. We aren’t very distant. But then again, it depends. Some first year students STILL use the formal ‘you’, which is not what we really strive for.
Student – Personal relationship. You aren’t a number, you have a name! I’m happy with it. Teachers are there to help you, not to mandate you.
Student – There is a lot of interaction, communication. Teachers actually listen to you when you are speaking. They’re responsive and alert.
4. Describe your concept of school. Is it obligatory? Is it a privilege?
Teacher – I think it is a privilege; however a lot of students don’t experience it like that. Everyone sees it as a common thing–a right.
Student – It is gezellig. It is a privilege that I want to do. I am a part of a student club/union and it is ook gezellig.
Student – Gezellig. I enjoy school.
5. What qualifies as an effective way of teaching? Of learning?
Teacher – Its important to make student think for themselves. Giving a personal opinion is helpful, but it is extremely important to create an atmosphere in a classroom that encourages students to ask questions and think for themselves.
Student – Put the responsibility on the student, its mandatory to have the student work for themselves. Practical learning is important because you learn more by doing than by boring yourself with a textbook.
Student – Active. We have a room where we can practice what we learn. We have an intern-like opportunity where we are put in a job-like setting. That I think, is important.
6. If you could change the school system, what changes would you make to it? What would you keep the same?
Teacher – Increase foreign-exchange interest and integrate foreigners with residential students. Teachers used to edit student papers; now, peer-editing tactics allow students to think for themselves and make corrections and suggestions for their peers based on what they know; however, students still like it best when the teacher overlooks their work. Perhaps there should be a greater emphasis on theory, because a lot of knowledge gained by intense study and research is disregarded in the Dutch system. It is up to the student to keep up in his/her own theory lessons. Sometimes gaining book knowledge–obtained by serious study–gets put on the back burner.
Student – THE BUILDING!! I think its good to give more lessons. We have to study by ourselves a lot; however, I feel it is important that the teachers also tell us what they know and their opinion on the subject. The organization of school is not very good. There should be more awareness. If a class is not going to meet, I should know that ahead of time. An organized curriculum would be nice. Our syllabus is not very organized. I am happy with this school because of the freedom of religion, freedom to be a Christian and be open about it.
Student – I want to learn more at school as opposed to on my own. I would like to have more lectures and theory given by the teachers. More discipline to learn the material. Learning by yourself can be very difficult and it is nice to have the certainty of knowing something that teachers provide their students.
2c. Conclusion
In my opinion, there are benefits to both educational systems; however, the Dutch educational system appears to be more efficient. The American educational system puts too strong of an emphasis on theory; practice is often disregarded. However, it is crucial to put such an emphasis on theory so as not to lose indispensable knowledge. Skill is developed through practice, but why practice something you do not understand? I believe the Dutch educational system is a bit more mature in the sense that it focuses on preparing students for the vocational world at an early stage in life. They chose a “major”, so to speak, already in their second year of high school, which in my opinion is a bit to early to decide on a vocation; however, it could be seen as highly beneficial because focusing your study allows you to be very familiar with the field you chose to study. Though, liberal arts allows for a broader education and a more open understanding of the connections and relationships among various fields of study, which can also be seen as highly beneficial. It really depends on the way you look at things. I have a hard time with the segregation of students based on their “level” of intellect. I understand the idea behind it; however, weaker students, I feel, are challenged to become stronger when they have smarter students to compare with.
3. Evaluation of my most difficult classroom situation in the N-SPICE program
-First History test. I wasn’t sure what to expect because the curriculum is very different from America to Dutch education. I e-mailed the teacher who gave me a brief description of what the test would be like, but it was still not a very comfortable experience—then again, when is test taking comfortable? I’ve never had a problem understanding the teacher or the students, though I wish their was a little more interaction in the history class because it feels so ancient!
4. Reflection of studytrips and excursions
-One thing I was feeling on the studytrip to the Dutch high school was jealousy. I witnessed practical education with my own eyes and I wished I could have done that back in the day. Though I am very glad we have such a theory-based curriculum because I feel like I am learning more when reading it from a book than from practicing it for myself. However, practice is essential to learning and I would be more familiar with the stuff I’d read in books had I had the opportunity to explore the hands-on form of education.
5. Personal plan of development
I don’t understand. How am I suppose to develop in a few weeks time?
I want to learn Dutch. I want to discover the Dutch identity. Understanding the educational system of the Dutch is a step, and I feel like I have a better concept of the Dutch in the sense that I witnessed the structure of education Dutch students go through; however that is only one area. The Dutch identity is too broad, too vague. Just as it is impossible for me to define, without bias or opinion, the American identity, it is impossible for me to grasp the Dutch identity. If I cannot even identify myself, how can I be expected to identify the identity of a community of persons? Perhaps my aims are too high. Perhaps I need to centralize them more.
6. Asking for feedback
I used to get into arguments about the quality of the educational systems of the Netherlands and America with my very stubborn friend, Jan. It forced me to analyze the pro’s and con’s of the educational systems. This is what I came up with:
American Educational System:
PRO
-emphasis on theory–knowledge vs. skill
-no segregation; the weakest link is “forced” to work harder–survival of the fittest.
-equal opportunity IF you work for it–grades show your academic abilities–IMPORTANT!
-forces students to do their best
-liberal arts–focus’ on connections/relationships b/w fields of study; basic understanding of how everything works together
Types of schools: Private (religious schools), Charter, Public, Home, Boarding
Dutch Educational System:
PRO
-emphasis theory and practice–apply both forms of education to learning
-chose a “major” in high school–develop a very detailed understanding/skill in that field
-emphasize professionalism
-prepare for work force/profession before high school graduation
Perhaps my conclusions are a bit biased, but I feel that there are benefits to both systems as noted above.
Probably the most shocking difference between the two systems, to me, is the levels–separating students based on their level of understanding is a bit tough for me to deal with. I find myself curious as to what level I would be enrolled in–AND THEN AGAIN–I wouldn’t want to know, because I would hate knowing I am not smart enough to be a VBO student. I guess the emphasis on practical and independent study is also a bit shocking. I do not always like to do things on my own because I’m afraid that I am not understanding the material exactly. I like to know that what I am doing is right. Certainty is key! When I know I am right then I enjoy working alone. It’s the logic in me. Math, I can tell whether or not I am doing it wrong because there is only ONE right answer in math. I misinterpret a lot of readings and such, so I suppose it is important to me that I have a detailed explanation to go along with my reading. (Maybe that is because in America we are taught to listen as opposed to make decisions and opinions for ourselves.) What do you think? Is not an essential question in an American curriculum.
I feel like I’ve been left out a bit. Not being challenged to think for myself.
competency-based curriculum–emphasis on learning by experience, skill, practice, etc.
-ANALYZE DUTCH EDUCATION –nederlands dagblad, nrc, de volkskrant
2a. Observations
14-02-07 Greijndenus – Every student, in a way, is a “teacher’s pet” in the Dutch system.
Subject: care and well-being
-Small scale class of approximately 10-15 students. Teacher sat at a desk at the front of the class and the students sat in student desks facing the teacher. The students all had notebooks in front of them and the teacher was guiding them through the text.
Subject: chemistry
-Students worked in pairs of two with various chemicals–chemistry lab. I am assuming they were testing the reactions/results of mixing chemicals based on what they had learned about them in a textbook or formal lecture. I did not see the teacher.
Subject: business prep
-Some students worked at computers, others at desks reviewing textbook materials, and still others seemed to be neglecting the use of their time with irrelevant conversation. The teacher sat in the classroom, but was not instructing the students. The students more or less walked to their own beat. This class was a preparatory class for high school students to prepare for work after graduation. The purpose of the class was to teach students basic principles of business and management for various work-related situations. It appeared very un-organized. The teacher was not giving instructions, nor overseeing the work of the students.
Subject: unknown
-The students worked independently with power tools while the teacher came and went as desired. The students practiced safety and precision. They were intentional and very drawn to this way of learning. It appeared to be a trial and error-like simulation. Students are put to the test in skill and practice. I believe the emphasis of education is in the practical method of learning. Theoretical understanding is important, but only so if you can acquire skill and understanding in the field of practice. What good is the intellect you have acquired if you avoid practicing your knowledge and acquiring skill? I was envious of this classroom experience. I’ve missed out on education emphasizing the practical method of learning.
--Holland Christian High School offers classes with a minimum of 15 students–generally 22+ students. All classes focus on theory, with the exception of performing arts and fine arts courses, and occasional science labs. Generally the first 2 years of high school are mandatory liberal arts classes, the last 2 years of high school are more personal choice, though it is rare for students to deviate from the liberal arts study. Practical courses are offered for juniors and seniors at the local tech-center for students going into career fields immediately out of high school; cosmetology, dental assistance, physical/massage therapy, etc.
19-02-07 Gereformeerde Hogeschool
Subject: unknown; classroom in the basement
-Small scale class of approximately 12-14 students. Teacher does not stand at a podium, rather sits at desk level with the students. Teachers and students have a more direct–more personal–relationship with one another. Teachers do not have to ask questions to provoke responses and interest, students are equally involved in class discussions.
--Dordt college offers classes with a minimum of 15 students–generally 20+ students. The teacher lectures from a teachers guide textbook, and the students take notes based on the lectures. Teachers are their to teach, students are their to absorb the lecture, memorize it, and spit it back out on a test.
2b. Interview
1. What does it mean to attend class? Is it mandatory or recommended?
Teacher – Some classes are mandatory, some are optional–meant to be extra support. It depends on the class and the study program really.
Student – Recommended. Some classes are mandatory because if you do not attend you can’t do well on the exams.
Student – Some classes are required for taking and doing well on the tests. Not every study is equal, though. Class requirement/recommendation is subject to the study.
2. Give a brief explanation of the atmosphere you would find in a classroom.
Teacher – Most of the time its relaxed. It’s not very formal, but that could be because it is a small environment.
Student – It’s relaxed, some lectures are boring. The people and the interaction between students is relaxed.
Student – The classroom setting is not so gezellig... it’s actually quite boring.
3. In what way do teachers and students interact/communicate/relate?
Teacher – We strive to have a professional, personal relationship with each other. We think students can learn through personal relations. We aren’t very distant. But then again, it depends. Some first year students STILL use the formal ‘you’, which is not what we really strive for.
Student – Personal relationship. You aren’t a number, you have a name! I’m happy with it. Teachers are there to help you, not to mandate you.
Student – There is a lot of interaction, communication. Teachers actually listen to you when you are speaking. They’re responsive and alert.
4. Describe your concept of school. Is it obligatory? Is it a privilege?
Teacher – I think it is a privilege; however a lot of students don’t experience it like that. Everyone sees it as a common thing–a right.
Student – It is gezellig. It is a privilege that I want to do. I am a part of a student club/union and it is ook gezellig.
Student – Gezellig. I enjoy school.
5. What qualifies as an effective way of teaching? Of learning?
Teacher – Its important to make student think for themselves. Giving a personal opinion is helpful, but it is extremely important to create an atmosphere in a classroom that encourages students to ask questions and think for themselves.
Student – Put the responsibility on the student, its mandatory to have the student work for themselves. Practical learning is important because you learn more by doing than by boring yourself with a textbook.
Student – Active. We have a room where we can practice what we learn. We have an intern-like opportunity where we are put in a job-like setting. That I think, is important.
6. If you could change the school system, what changes would you make to it? What would you keep the same?
Teacher – Increase foreign-exchange interest and integrate foreigners with residential students. Teachers used to edit student papers; now, peer-editing tactics allow students to think for themselves and make corrections and suggestions for their peers based on what they know; however, students still like it best when the teacher overlooks their work. Perhaps there should be a greater emphasis on theory, because a lot of knowledge gained by intense study and research is disregarded in the Dutch system. It is up to the student to keep up in his/her own theory lessons. Sometimes gaining book knowledge–obtained by serious study–gets put on the back burner.
Student – THE BUILDING!! I think its good to give more lessons. We have to study by ourselves a lot; however, I feel it is important that the teachers also tell us what they know and their opinion on the subject. The organization of school is not very good. There should be more awareness. If a class is not going to meet, I should know that ahead of time. An organized curriculum would be nice. Our syllabus is not very organized. I am happy with this school because of the freedom of religion, freedom to be a Christian and be open about it.
Student – I want to learn more at school as opposed to on my own. I would like to have more lectures and theory given by the teachers. More discipline to learn the material. Learning by yourself can be very difficult and it is nice to have the certainty of knowing something that teachers provide their students.
2c. Conclusion
In my opinion, there are benefits to both educational systems; however, the Dutch educational system appears to be more efficient. The American educational system puts too strong of an emphasis on theory; practice is often disregarded. However, it is crucial to put such an emphasis on theory so as not to lose indispensable knowledge. Skill is developed through practice, but why practice something you do not understand? I believe the Dutch educational system is a bit more mature in the sense that it focuses on preparing students for the vocational world at an early stage in life. They chose a “major”, so to speak, already in their second year of high school, which in my opinion is a bit to early to decide on a vocation; however, it could be seen as highly beneficial because focusing your study allows you to be very familiar with the field you chose to study. Though, liberal arts allows for a broader education and a more open understanding of the connections and relationships among various fields of study, which can also be seen as highly beneficial. It really depends on the way you look at things. I have a hard time with the segregation of students based on their “level” of intellect. I understand the idea behind it; however, weaker students, I feel, are challenged to become stronger when they have smarter students to compare with.
3. Evaluation of my most difficult classroom situation in the N-SPICE program
-First History test. I wasn’t sure what to expect because the curriculum is very different from America to Dutch education. I e-mailed the teacher who gave me a brief description of what the test would be like, but it was still not a very comfortable experience—then again, when is test taking comfortable? I’ve never had a problem understanding the teacher or the students, though I wish their was a little more interaction in the history class because it feels so ancient!
4. Reflection of studytrips and excursions
-One thing I was feeling on the studytrip to the Dutch high school was jealousy. I witnessed practical education with my own eyes and I wished I could have done that back in the day. Though I am very glad we have such a theory-based curriculum because I feel like I am learning more when reading it from a book than from practicing it for myself. However, practice is essential to learning and I would be more familiar with the stuff I’d read in books had I had the opportunity to explore the hands-on form of education.
5. Personal plan of development
I don’t understand. How am I suppose to develop in a few weeks time?
I want to learn Dutch. I want to discover the Dutch identity. Understanding the educational system of the Dutch is a step, and I feel like I have a better concept of the Dutch in the sense that I witnessed the structure of education Dutch students go through; however that is only one area. The Dutch identity is too broad, too vague. Just as it is impossible for me to define, without bias or opinion, the American identity, it is impossible for me to grasp the Dutch identity. If I cannot even identify myself, how can I be expected to identify the identity of a community of persons? Perhaps my aims are too high. Perhaps I need to centralize them more.
6. Asking for feedback
I used to get into arguments about the quality of the educational systems of the Netherlands and America with my very stubborn friend, Jan. It forced me to analyze the pro’s and con’s of the educational systems. This is what I came up with:
American Educational System:
PRO
-emphasis on theory–knowledge vs. skill
-no segregation; the weakest link is “forced” to work harder–survival of the fittest.
-equal opportunity IF you work for it–grades show your academic abilities–IMPORTANT!
-forces students to do their best
-liberal arts–focus’ on connections/relationships b/w fields of study; basic understanding of how everything works together
Types of schools: Private (religious schools), Charter, Public, Home, Boarding
Dutch Educational System:
PRO
-emphasis theory and practice–apply both forms of education to learning
-chose a “major” in high school–develop a very detailed understanding/skill in that field
-emphasize professionalism
-prepare for work force/profession before high school graduation
Perhaps my conclusions are a bit biased, but I feel that there are benefits to both systems as noted above.
Probably the most shocking difference between the two systems, to me, is the levels–separating students based on their level of understanding is a bit tough for me to deal with. I find myself curious as to what level I would be enrolled in–AND THEN AGAIN–I wouldn’t want to know, because I would hate knowing I am not smart enough to be a VBO student. I guess the emphasis on practical and independent study is also a bit shocking. I do not always like to do things on my own because I’m afraid that I am not understanding the material exactly. I like to know that what I am doing is right. Certainty is key! When I know I am right then I enjoy working alone. It’s the logic in me. Math, I can tell whether or not I am doing it wrong because there is only ONE right answer in math. I misinterpret a lot of readings and such, so I suppose it is important to me that I have a detailed explanation to go along with my reading. (Maybe that is because in America we are taught to listen as opposed to make decisions and opinions for ourselves.) What do you think? Is not an essential question in an American curriculum.
I feel like I’ve been left out a bit. Not being challenged to think for myself.
vrijdag 9 februari 2007
Portfolio File 1: I and the Netherlands in a Bird’s Eye View
1a. Personal description
-As a young child, I was passionate about school and about learning, as most children are. As I got older, I lost interest in school. Textbooks and lectures bored me. I needed a new method of instruction to keep me motivated and learning. In high school, I put my social life ahead of my school life and spent the majority of my time “exercising my social skills”–in reality, I was busy making unhealthy relationships that messed up my priorities big time. The only connection I really had with school was theater. I held on to that like it was gold. I never had a difficult time in school, so I was able to BS my way to graduation. I only managed to fail ONE class, and I took three Advanced Placement classes to keep my resume looking stylish for my college applications. My first year at Dordt college was mostly a year of transformation. I was trying to re-arrange my priorities, but that didn’t really work. My boyfriend was first, then my education. This past semester at Dordt College, I finally arranged my priorities in a semi-healthy way. My education was first, boyfriend second. I am proud to say that I’ve set my priorities straight. God is first, and that is all I can say, for after him everything else comes together fashionably.
-I chose to participate on N-SPICE to get away from Dordt, to get closer to my boyfriend, and to get closer to myself. I felt called to the Netherlands in a way. It just felt like the place for me to be, as an art history major and as a woman with determination.
-I expect to be modified. I expect to come closer to God. I expect to come closer to myself. I expect to discover new, healthier friendships. I expect to develop potential and worth. I expect a lot, and, expectations as a product of motivation, ensures me that I will achieve it.
-I hope to learn about God. I hope to learn about myself. I hope to learn about the Dutch youth. I hope to learn the Dutch image. I hope to learn the Dutch lifestyle. I hope to learn about Dutch convictions, values, and norms. I hope to learn the heart of the Dutch. I hope to learn the Dutch language.
-Communication. How I, as an American, communicate vs how Dutch people communicate is very different because of our cultural differences and our languages. Learning good communication is a process of a number of stepping stones. I see this as the most critical obstacle because it is the foundation of relationships and relationships/connections are everything.
-Others can expect me to be a risk taker. Trial and error is the most effective learning method for myself. I will try, most likely fail, but learn from my mistake and try to come out stronger on the other end. I’m a go-getter, a social-addict, and I am extremely independent.
-This program is successful when it allows me the freedom to take risks. This program is even more successful when it encourages me to take risks. Sometimes I need a little shove/nudge in the right direction.
-My family emigrated to Canada from Nijverdal. I still have cousins, aunts, and uncles surviving in the Netherlands. My dad is familiar with the Dutch language and has been here a number of times. This is the third time I have set foot in this country. The Netherlands is practically my second home. I love it here and I have family here. I am home.
-I know a lot about the Netherlands, but not nearly enough OF the Netherlands. I know the basics. The Netherlands and I have been intimate in the past, yet I know nothing of its soul. That is what I want to discover. I don’t have any expectations of the Netherlands. Why? Because I’ve learned from past experience not to expect anything. Assumptions (expectations) make an ass out of you and me. I suppose my only expectation of the Netherlands is that this country, this culture, will “learn me something good”, something useful. I expect to leave with a vision.
-I want to discover the heart of the Netherlands. I want to discover it’s soul. What makes the Netherlands tick? What sorts of bicycle wheels are these Dutch-folk peddling?–What is Dutch? What does it mean to be Dutch?
1b. Portfolio document
-I am very social. I like to take risks. I enjoy writing and making art. I am creative in various ways. I’m extremely independent and like to do things for myself. I like to move it, move it! When you get me going, there’s no telling when I will stop. I have a rare personality, bold and demanding! I am very stubborn and I hate admitting when I am wrong, but I enjoy the quarrel that it takes to get me to realize I’m being irrational. I’m more of a talker than a listener, but as an observer, I can tell you everything that I saw/noticed while in conversation.
-Values: freedom, education, experience, morality, relationships
-Norms: freedom of expression–individual, diverse, everyone is entitled to their own opinion
-Convictions: God’s will be done; He gives the best advise
-Strengths/qualities: organized, creative, expressive, determined, go-getter, observant
-Weaknesses: pessimist, inattentive, tentative–hesitant, contradictory, non-assertive
-My group role: The illustrator, Secretary–keep everything organized and orderly
-Support needed: interrogate, challenge abstract convictions, offer constructive criticism, offer alternative perspectives/ideas
1c. Description of the situation in and around the host family
--I do not have a host family, rather, a host-mate. Her name is Liesbeth Geuze. She is 26 years old and she works as a teacher in the nursing department of the GH. She is a lively woman with a wonderful spirit, ambitious and goal-oriented. She has a very strong faith in God and I admire her core qualities. She has a number of good friends and a Bible study group. Her friend, Lambya, often comes by to visit. Lambya is Arabic and a Muslim. I fancy her. We have a very difficult time conversing with each other because she speaks Dutch with a very Arabic-accent and her English is extremely limited. We mostly communicate with visuals, but it is nice to watch Liesbeth and her carry on a conversation.
--The house is an apartment, and it is being remodeled, so for the first week I was living in the woonkamer, which was not a very comfortable living arrangement. I now have my own room and it is nice to have a bit of privacy. The apartment is filled with photographs of friends and of strangers from various places of the world. Every night we light a couple of candles around the house. Het is gezellig, aside from all the boxes and stuff lying around.
--Liesbeth has been to Africa and America and has a number of Ethiopian friends. She is very enthusiastic about photography. At the moment she is working on her Masters Degree and spends a great deal of her time doing research for her study. She is very motivated and she looks to God for guidance, all the time.
--Liesbeth has a NEE/NEE sticker on her mailbox so we never receive a newspaper. She does, however, always try to catch the news at 20.00u. We try to watch it together, but that doesn’t always happen. Liesbeth voted CU.
2a. Reflection on your first week in the host family
Describe Liesbeth using one word. Ambitious. Selfless. Strong. Determined. Hospitable.If an article were to be written over Liesbeth, what would you expect to read? She credits everything to God. Liesbeth is a very motivated woman. She lives several lives, one here, one in Africa, one in America. She has been to many places and seen many things and God has touched her in many ways. She is deeply concerned about others.
2b. Determination of the lines of reflection for the personal plan of development
Dutch language – I want to learn to speak Dutch well enough to carry on a conversation pertaining to various situations. It is very important to me that I learn the Dutch language because, in my opinion, language is essential in connection to discovering the heart of a culture. Communication is one of the most critical aspects of community–of culture. For all people, it is easiest to communicate and express their true feelings in their own tongue.
Approach: study Dutch words, phrases, sentences, grammar, etc and put it to practice every opportunity I receive. Get involved, socialize with fellow GH students. Attempt to journal in Dutch.
God – I want to become closer to God. I want to know Him for who He is and to gain a more accurate understanding of His true nature. God created the world and as the creator, He is inevitably instilled/inscribed into the world. It is the work of His hands. I once learned, “A text without context is a pretext for trouble”. You must always look at the picture as a whole. Leaving one part out could distort the entire image–the very purpose of the masterpiece. Taking God out of His creation results in an inaccurate conviction of who God is. To experience God in context, in all creation, presents a more accurate image of God. No man will ever know God, but man is fully capable of experiencing God and becoming close to God. I want to study God from various angles, not just from America, but from His world.
Approach: Continue reading the Word of God and continue praying as I have in the past; furthermore, talk about God with believers from this country as well as from the N-SPICE program. Take note of how God “changes” from believer to believer. Take in the sites of God–the canals, the landscape, the city-scape. Reflect on God as a creator and as a friend.
Dutch relationships – I want to make friends with students from the GH and spend time with them outside of school, conversing and experiencing typical Dutch student life.
Approach: Put myself out there. If I can make friends in the States, I can make friends in Europe. Of course, I don’t plan on this being an easy task, but I am a risk taker and if I make a complete fool of myself, I can have a good laugh! I’m not too fond of the buddy-system; however, I might have to take advantage of it in order to get introduced to other Dutch students.
Dutch/American identity – I want to develop a more accurate definition of the American identity and by discovering the Dutch identity.
Approach: Make friends with the “buddies” from the GH. Spend as much time as possible with GH students as opposed to N-SPICE students. Ask questions, make observations, reflect on things that catch me off guard.
My identity – I want to obtain a more defined image of myself. I want to be able to identify myself when interrogated about my personal convictions. When asked, who am I? I want to be able to answer people with confidence. I want to develop my opinions and beliefs with reason. If I feel a certain way about something, I want to be able to give an apology, a defense, for my conviction. I want to have reason behind all of my convictions.
Approach: Write everything down. State my conviction and back it up. Test the strength of my conviction! Introduce my convictions to other people to gain outside perspectives that will help defend or amend my conviction, keeping in mind that I am entitled to my own convictions and no opposing perspective shall defeat what I feel most strongly about; however, those opposing convictions may be used to perfect my conviction.
-As a young child, I was passionate about school and about learning, as most children are. As I got older, I lost interest in school. Textbooks and lectures bored me. I needed a new method of instruction to keep me motivated and learning. In high school, I put my social life ahead of my school life and spent the majority of my time “exercising my social skills”–in reality, I was busy making unhealthy relationships that messed up my priorities big time. The only connection I really had with school was theater. I held on to that like it was gold. I never had a difficult time in school, so I was able to BS my way to graduation. I only managed to fail ONE class, and I took three Advanced Placement classes to keep my resume looking stylish for my college applications. My first year at Dordt college was mostly a year of transformation. I was trying to re-arrange my priorities, but that didn’t really work. My boyfriend was first, then my education. This past semester at Dordt College, I finally arranged my priorities in a semi-healthy way. My education was first, boyfriend second. I am proud to say that I’ve set my priorities straight. God is first, and that is all I can say, for after him everything else comes together fashionably.
-I chose to participate on N-SPICE to get away from Dordt, to get closer to my boyfriend, and to get closer to myself. I felt called to the Netherlands in a way. It just felt like the place for me to be, as an art history major and as a woman with determination.
-I expect to be modified. I expect to come closer to God. I expect to come closer to myself. I expect to discover new, healthier friendships. I expect to develop potential and worth. I expect a lot, and, expectations as a product of motivation, ensures me that I will achieve it.
-I hope to learn about God. I hope to learn about myself. I hope to learn about the Dutch youth. I hope to learn the Dutch image. I hope to learn the Dutch lifestyle. I hope to learn about Dutch convictions, values, and norms. I hope to learn the heart of the Dutch. I hope to learn the Dutch language.
-Communication. How I, as an American, communicate vs how Dutch people communicate is very different because of our cultural differences and our languages. Learning good communication is a process of a number of stepping stones. I see this as the most critical obstacle because it is the foundation of relationships and relationships/connections are everything.
-Others can expect me to be a risk taker. Trial and error is the most effective learning method for myself. I will try, most likely fail, but learn from my mistake and try to come out stronger on the other end. I’m a go-getter, a social-addict, and I am extremely independent.
-This program is successful when it allows me the freedom to take risks. This program is even more successful when it encourages me to take risks. Sometimes I need a little shove/nudge in the right direction.
-My family emigrated to Canada from Nijverdal. I still have cousins, aunts, and uncles surviving in the Netherlands. My dad is familiar with the Dutch language and has been here a number of times. This is the third time I have set foot in this country. The Netherlands is practically my second home. I love it here and I have family here. I am home.
-I know a lot about the Netherlands, but not nearly enough OF the Netherlands. I know the basics. The Netherlands and I have been intimate in the past, yet I know nothing of its soul. That is what I want to discover. I don’t have any expectations of the Netherlands. Why? Because I’ve learned from past experience not to expect anything. Assumptions (expectations) make an ass out of you and me. I suppose my only expectation of the Netherlands is that this country, this culture, will “learn me something good”, something useful. I expect to leave with a vision.
-I want to discover the heart of the Netherlands. I want to discover it’s soul. What makes the Netherlands tick? What sorts of bicycle wheels are these Dutch-folk peddling?–What is Dutch? What does it mean to be Dutch?
1b. Portfolio document
-I am very social. I like to take risks. I enjoy writing and making art. I am creative in various ways. I’m extremely independent and like to do things for myself. I like to move it, move it! When you get me going, there’s no telling when I will stop. I have a rare personality, bold and demanding! I am very stubborn and I hate admitting when I am wrong, but I enjoy the quarrel that it takes to get me to realize I’m being irrational. I’m more of a talker than a listener, but as an observer, I can tell you everything that I saw/noticed while in conversation.
-Values: freedom, education, experience, morality, relationships
-Norms: freedom of expression–individual, diverse, everyone is entitled to their own opinion
-Convictions: God’s will be done; He gives the best advise
-Strengths/qualities: organized, creative, expressive, determined, go-getter, observant
-Weaknesses: pessimist, inattentive, tentative–hesitant, contradictory, non-assertive
-My group role: The illustrator, Secretary–keep everything organized and orderly
-Support needed: interrogate, challenge abstract convictions, offer constructive criticism, offer alternative perspectives/ideas
1c. Description of the situation in and around the host family
--I do not have a host family, rather, a host-mate. Her name is Liesbeth Geuze. She is 26 years old and she works as a teacher in the nursing department of the GH. She is a lively woman with a wonderful spirit, ambitious and goal-oriented. She has a very strong faith in God and I admire her core qualities. She has a number of good friends and a Bible study group. Her friend, Lambya, often comes by to visit. Lambya is Arabic and a Muslim. I fancy her. We have a very difficult time conversing with each other because she speaks Dutch with a very Arabic-accent and her English is extremely limited. We mostly communicate with visuals, but it is nice to watch Liesbeth and her carry on a conversation.
--The house is an apartment, and it is being remodeled, so for the first week I was living in the woonkamer, which was not a very comfortable living arrangement. I now have my own room and it is nice to have a bit of privacy. The apartment is filled with photographs of friends and of strangers from various places of the world. Every night we light a couple of candles around the house. Het is gezellig, aside from all the boxes and stuff lying around.
--Liesbeth has been to Africa and America and has a number of Ethiopian friends. She is very enthusiastic about photography. At the moment she is working on her Masters Degree and spends a great deal of her time doing research for her study. She is very motivated and she looks to God for guidance, all the time.
--Liesbeth has a NEE/NEE sticker on her mailbox so we never receive a newspaper. She does, however, always try to catch the news at 20.00u. We try to watch it together, but that doesn’t always happen. Liesbeth voted CU.
2a. Reflection on your first week in the host family
Describe Liesbeth using one word. Ambitious. Selfless. Strong. Determined. Hospitable.If an article were to be written over Liesbeth, what would you expect to read? She credits everything to God. Liesbeth is a very motivated woman. She lives several lives, one here, one in Africa, one in America. She has been to many places and seen many things and God has touched her in many ways. She is deeply concerned about others.
2b. Determination of the lines of reflection for the personal plan of development
Dutch language – I want to learn to speak Dutch well enough to carry on a conversation pertaining to various situations. It is very important to me that I learn the Dutch language because, in my opinion, language is essential in connection to discovering the heart of a culture. Communication is one of the most critical aspects of community–of culture. For all people, it is easiest to communicate and express their true feelings in their own tongue.
Approach: study Dutch words, phrases, sentences, grammar, etc and put it to practice every opportunity I receive. Get involved, socialize with fellow GH students. Attempt to journal in Dutch.
God – I want to become closer to God. I want to know Him for who He is and to gain a more accurate understanding of His true nature. God created the world and as the creator, He is inevitably instilled/inscribed into the world. It is the work of His hands. I once learned, “A text without context is a pretext for trouble”. You must always look at the picture as a whole. Leaving one part out could distort the entire image–the very purpose of the masterpiece. Taking God out of His creation results in an inaccurate conviction of who God is. To experience God in context, in all creation, presents a more accurate image of God. No man will ever know God, but man is fully capable of experiencing God and becoming close to God. I want to study God from various angles, not just from America, but from His world.
Approach: Continue reading the Word of God and continue praying as I have in the past; furthermore, talk about God with believers from this country as well as from the N-SPICE program. Take note of how God “changes” from believer to believer. Take in the sites of God–the canals, the landscape, the city-scape. Reflect on God as a creator and as a friend.
Dutch relationships – I want to make friends with students from the GH and spend time with them outside of school, conversing and experiencing typical Dutch student life.
Approach: Put myself out there. If I can make friends in the States, I can make friends in Europe. Of course, I don’t plan on this being an easy task, but I am a risk taker and if I make a complete fool of myself, I can have a good laugh! I’m not too fond of the buddy-system; however, I might have to take advantage of it in order to get introduced to other Dutch students.
Dutch/American identity – I want to develop a more accurate definition of the American identity and by discovering the Dutch identity.
Approach: Make friends with the “buddies” from the GH. Spend as much time as possible with GH students as opposed to N-SPICE students. Ask questions, make observations, reflect on things that catch me off guard.
My identity – I want to obtain a more defined image of myself. I want to be able to identify myself when interrogated about my personal convictions. When asked, who am I? I want to be able to answer people with confidence. I want to develop my opinions and beliefs with reason. If I feel a certain way about something, I want to be able to give an apology, a defense, for my conviction. I want to have reason behind all of my convictions.
Approach: Write everything down. State my conviction and back it up. Test the strength of my conviction! Introduce my convictions to other people to gain outside perspectives that will help defend or amend my conviction, keeping in mind that I am entitled to my own convictions and no opposing perspective shall defeat what I feel most strongly about; however, those opposing convictions may be used to perfect my conviction.
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)
